| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hensome2004
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 5:50 am Post subject: How to setup Catalyst 2960 simulator? |
|
|
Hi all,
I am using GNS3 as a CCNA simulator for configuring Catalyst 2960 and prepare for the exam. I understand that it does not directly support Cisco switch simulation, but rather use the NM-16ESW module for 2960 simulation.
The problem is that where can I download the IOS image for this? Is there any one who can successfully use GNS3 to simulate 2960? Please share your experience here, (including where to find the relevant information for the setup).
Thanks.
Henry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MaxOD
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 2 Location: Upstate NY
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 12:07 pm Post subject: 2960 |
|
|
| Yes! You use either the 7200 router ios, loaded with the 16em module. It has all of the vlan commands hidden. As this is a layer 3 device capable of routing ands swithing.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thumpercisco
Joined: 28 Jun 2007 Posts: 889 Location: Chesapeake, VA
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
could you post your .net using the 7200 IOS with NM-16ESW module in a slot please, and works when the lab is run. _________________ "AIaO"
ThumperCisco
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ccie14745
Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 447 Location: Dallas, TX
|
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
To support the NM-16ESW, you will have to have a 2600/3600/3700 series router. I recommend the following image and idlepc value, which has worked well for me:
c3725-ipbasek9-mz.124-21.bin = 0x6127034c
The newer the IOS image, the more likely you are to have ESW bugs fixed. I recently switch from using c3620-is-mz.123-21.bin to the c3725 image above after trying to load up about 10 routers acting as switches and getting issues with STP that were only solved with the code upgrade.
C7200 series routers don't offer a switch module that you can use, although there are some 8-port ethernet port adapters that could be used for ports (just not switch ports, unless you want to learn IRB and CRB ). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cyberadmin
Joined: 23 Apr 2009 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:39 am Post subject: how about with .. |
|
|
imm..
how about with this image c3550-ipbasek9-mz.122-25.SEE4.bin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ccie14745
Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 447 Location: Dallas, TX
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| That image is for the Catalyst switches, which Dynamips will not support. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cyberadmin
Joined: 23 Apr 2009 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 4:15 am Post subject: sorry.. |
|
|
sorry..
wrong paste img name..
i mean this
c2600-advsecurityk9-mz.124-17.bin
if this img can,,plz advice me how to set it up like a switch ..
thz. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ccie14745
Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 447 Location: Dallas, TX
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As I said, most newer 2600 images would apply. You need add a NM-16ESW module. Here's a sample .NET file I created to play with switching scenarios:
| Code: | autostart = false
model = 3725
[localhost]
ghostios = true
workingdir = C:\Program Files\Dynamips\sample_labs\switchingv11\working
[[3725]]
image = \Program Files\Dynamips\images\c3725-ipbase-mz.124-15.T7.bin
disk0 = 8
disk1 = 0
ram = 128
confreg = 0x2102
slot1 = NM-16ESW
[[ROUTER CORE1]]
F1/0 = CORE2 F1/0
F1/1 = CORE2 F1/1
F1/2 = DIST1 F1/0
F1/3 = DIST1 F1/1
F1/4 = DIST2 F1/0
F1/5 = DIST2 F1/1
F1/6 = DIST3 F1/0
F1/7 = DIST3 F1/1
F1/8 = DIST4 F1/0
F1/9 = DIST4 F1/1
[[ROUTER CORE2]]
F1/2 = DIST1 F1/2
F1/3 = DIST1 F1/3
F1/4 = DIST2 F1/2
F1/5 = DIST2 F1/3
F1/6 = DIST3 F1/2
F1/7 = DIST3 F1/3
F1/8 = DIST4 F1/2
F1/9 = DIST4 F1/3
[[ROUTER DIST1]]
[[ROUTER DIST2]]
[[ROUTER DIST3]]
[[ROUTER DIST4]] |
Replace the image in that topology with the one you want to use. You should also adjust the model name. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cyberadmin
Joined: 23 Apr 2009 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 5:17 am Post subject: it work..but |
|
|
yeah.! it work..
but i don't know how to config vlan..
it does'nt like cisco catalyst 2960 switch series...
can't use
in glo config mode ' vlan vlan-id' to creat new vlan
'show vlan brief' in priv Exec mode
'switchport port-security' in inter subcomm
i think i can creat new vlan with 'vlan database' comd instead of 'vlan vlan-id' comd
i use c2600-advsecurityk9-mz.124-17.bin image
what do u think..
can i add (connect )remote host's NIC (different subnet with my NIC) to emulated routers interf
thz 4 ur reply ccie14745.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ccie14745
Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 447 Location: Dallas, TX
|
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 4:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| So, not all the commands are the same. Use "show vlan-switch brief" instead of "show vlan brief". Also, I would recommend upgrading your IOS version to the latest 12.4T release supported (probably 12.4(15)T8, last I looked). You'll find support for port security becomes available, as does configuring VLANs in config mode instead of the "vlan database". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cyberadmin
Joined: 23 Apr 2009 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 3:14 am Post subject: sec feature not includ.. |
|
|
i've change my IOS to
c3725-adventerprisek9-mz.124-15.T8.image
but i think it still not include port security feature..
and some of vlan feature command is not inclu
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ccie14745
Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 447 Location: Dallas, TX
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
There's certainly limitations, as you're discovering. For example, the implementation of port security does not use the "switchport port-security" command:
Configuring the MAC Table to Provide Port Security
There's a lot of features not available, many of which are specified in a list on that web page. If you really need things like PVLANs, BPDUFilter, VACLs, and all the other things not supported, I suggest you buy real switches. There's not any way to practice those things using Dynagen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
memoonamike
Joined: 11 Jun 2012 Posts: 90 Location: Pakistan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ciscotrainer
Joined: 22 Jul 2012 Posts: 5 Location: Chennai, India
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
What I feel is, for Cisco CCNA or CCNP Routing part GNS3 is the best option under the sun. But for Cisco CCNA or CCNP Switching part, you have to rely on real Cisco Switches, currently.
Hope GNS3 developers can find a solution for this soon... _________________ Thanks and regards,
Cisco Trainer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|